I'll pull the latest ward-tracker snapshot now.

I pulled the sheet, but something looks off — worth flagging before we go further:

• The sheet is named "NUHS Snapshot 24 June" and its data covers visit dates 25–26 June.
• I pulled it targeting operating day 2026-07-03 (tomorrow), but nothing matches — 0 visits inserted/updated/cancelled, and no new unenriched visits, even though 67 patients were "seen."

This suggests the Google Sheet itself hasn't been updated with tomorrow's (July 3) data yet — it's still showing an old snapshot from late June. Syncing again won't help until the ward updates the sheet.

That worked — 84 visits pulled for June 26, but all of them arrived with no planning constraints yet (84 unenriched refs).

Before I can set constraints and run the solver, let me check the rostering knowledge base rules, and also look at the day's current schedule/staffing.

Let me pull the two rostering knowledge docs to apply the correct rules.

Here's where things stand:

What I did:

1. First tried pulling the sheet for July 3 (tomorrow) — but the sheet itself only had data through June 25–26, so nothing synced (0 visits).
2. You said to pull for June 26 instead — that worked: 84 visits came in across wards A, C, F for 39 patients/beds.
3. I checked the day's existing roster: 7 nurses on shift (9-5), no solver run yet.
4. I read the two rostering knowledge docs (IV antibiotic durations + the visit→constraint playbook) so I can correctly size each visit's duration, start window, skills, and flags.

What's left — the important part: all 84 visits came in with no planning constraints (duration, timing window, skills). I need to work through each one — using the drug/task text, line notes, and the playbook's rules (e.g. Ertapenem = 60 min flat, Ceftriaxone/Rocephin = 30 min, PICC access needs PICC management skill, dose-spacing for TDS/BD regimens, etc.) — and set constraints for all of them before I can run the solver.

This is a meaty batch (39 patients, several with 3 doses/day, some with strict timing like "strictly 0800hrs" or FV flags). I'll now go through and enrich them in one batch call. No decision needed from you yet — I'll report back with the draft plan once solved.

All 84 visits are now enriched — no unknowns, nothing left unconstrained. Now let me run the solver to generate a draft roster.

Sync + enrichment done, and the solver produced a draft. Here's the summary for June 26:

Draft plan (run 866e54f0):

• 84 visits total — 30 in-house, 54 to vendor
• 7 nurses, each carrying 4–5 visits (well balanced)
• Total drive time: ~557 min across the team
• 2 cross-ward visits

⚠️ One mandatory gap — this needs your attention:

• C20#1 (IV Cefazolin + PICC line care) fell to the vendor, but it's flagged central_line — meaning it really should stay in-house (PICC access is our own nurses' job). No in-house PICC-skilled nurse had room for it in the AM slot.

Preferred (soft) gaps — nice-to-have but not mandatory:

• F13#1, F09#3, F09#1 — all caregiver-training visits that would ideally be in-house for continuity, but went to vendor.

Only Chua Shi Min Amanda and Sabrina Atan have PICC/Infusor skills among AM-available nurses — worth checking if one of them can free up a slot for C20#1.